Right Side Redux - Pro-Miers and Con-Miers Arguments with Sources
My head is swimming. I am literally vacillating back and forth, pro then con then pro then con, for Miers. There are very good arguments on both sides. My Program Management background wants me to make a list. So here it is.
" will cause the ideological balance on the Supreme Court to shift to the right" - Barnes 10/3/05
President feels comfortable with her
Could very likely turn out to be a Scalia
" Harriet Miers could turn out to be a solid conservative justice, with an intellect and commitment to constitutional rectitude to match Antonin Scalia " - NRO Editors 10/3/05
Miers argued for ABA voting on issues like abortion
First woman partner in her law firm
First woman head of the Texas ABA
Distinguished lawyer
" By consensus, she’s a distinguished attorney and highly capable presidential aide. " - Goldberg 10/5/05
Bush was weakened politically, had to move this direction.
" He’s weakened by Katrina, Iraq, and the polls, and he can’t afford Armageddon in the Senate. A stealthy, female nominee who was all but pre-approved by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid is the prudent step at this time. " - Goldberg 10/5/05
President has consistently chosen conservative judges
" President Bush's appointments to the federal bench appear to have been remarkably consistent" - Dobson 10/3/05
President knows her (unlike the Souter situation)
" he first President Bush didn't know David Souter, but trusted Chief of Staff Sunnunu and Senator Rudman. The first President Bush got burned badly because he trusted the enthusiams of others." - Hewitt 10/3/05
" Prof. Barnett and the others who are crying "Cronyism!" are using friendship and trust that's developed through superb service with the President as a disqualifying factor, irrespective of the nominee's other credentials and experience. That's a mistake. " - Beldar 10/4/05
Convert Republican like Reagan
"sometimes converts are the best Republicans" Tony Snow 10/3/05
" Converts — of the political or religious variety — do often tend to be true believers....When you decide as an adult, you make sure you know what you're getting into, etc... " - Lopez, Bench Memos 10/3/05
Deep White House experience
" she is not the most qualified woman to be on the SCOTUS for the simple reason that she has been in the White House for many years " - Hewitt 10/3/05
Politics Poker play
" he president is a poker player in a long game. He's decided to take a sure win with a good sized pot." - Hewitt 10/3/05
" Other conservatives are dismayed that the President is playing politics (!), rather than simply choosing the “best” candidate. But the President understands that confirmation is nothing but a political game, ever since Robert Bork, truly one of the finest legal minds of his era, was demonized and defeated. " - Lifson 10/4/05
"I spoke today with four individuals who know Harriet Miers very well and have worked very closely (in at least one case, extremely closely) with her. I know three of these individuals very well and deeply trust their judgment on matters of judicial philosophy and character. Although I do not know the fourth individual, that individual’s public record gives me ample reason to trust his judgment on matters of judicial philosophy. All four individuals are genuinely enthusiastic about Miers’s nomination and strongly believe that she will be an excellent judicial conservative " - 10/3/06 Whelan
Stealth triumph
" I think there’s quite a decent chance that Garnett is right about Miers. This could turn into our ultimate stealth triumph " - Kurtz 10/3/05
Corporate experience is a plus
Anti-establishment approach
" The GOP is not the party which idolizes Ivy League acceptability as the criterion of intellectual and mental fitness. " - Lifson 10/4/05
Great managerial experience
" Ms. Miers has actually managed a business, a substantial one with hundreds of employees, and has had to meet a payroll and conform to tax, affirmative acttion, and other regulatory demands of the state. " - Lifson 10/4/05
Been active during White House during wartime
" She has also been highly active in a White House during wartime, when national security considerations have been a matter of life and death. " - Lifson 10/4/05
Opposing the president's choise is a bad idea
" A defeated nominee does him and the future of American jurisprudence no favors. " - Lifson 10/4/05
" Harriet Miers is the nominee, and the relevant question going forward is whether to support her nomination, oppose it, or stand on the sidelines." - Whelen 10/3/05
Feminists can't run against her
" By presenting a female nominee, he kicks a leg out from under the stool on which the feminist left sits. Not just a female, but a career woman, one who has not raised children, not married a male, and has a number of “firsts” to her credit as a pioneer of women's achievement in Texas law. Let the feminists try to demonize her " - Lifson 10/4/05
Personality to win over the court
" Having proven herself capable of charming the likes of Harry Reid, leader of the Senate Democrats, is there much room for doubt that Harriet Miers is capable of opening up opponents emotionally to hear and actually consider as potentially worthwhile the views of those they might presume to be their enemies? " Lifson 10/4/05
Constitutionalist
" In fact, though, Miers is exactly like Roberts in one crucial aspect: They are both steadfast adherents to a judicial ethic of no personally imposed points of view." - Kmiec 10/4/05
Senate is too liberal to vote a Luttig in
" There are not enough Republican votes in the Senate to win an ideological fight over a nominee like Michael Luttig, Edith Jones, or Janice Rogers Brown"
" The fact is that this Gang of 14 moderates, led by Senator John McCain, did make it much more difficult for the president to win an ideological battle over a Supreme Court nominee." - Levin 10/6/05
"When it comes to taking on a tough fight with the Senate Democrats over judicial nominations, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist doesn't really have a majority to lead. Before the President nominated anybody, before he even took the oath of office for his second term, Senator Arlen Specter was already warning him not to nominate anyone who would rile up the Senate. Later, Senator John Warner issued a similar warning. It sounded like a familiar Republican strategy of pre-emptive surrender." - Sowell 10/8/05
Judicial philosophy is more than just bench work
" In any event, it's surprising, but also very disappointing and frankly a bit insulting, that he [Barnett] seems to think lawyers who are neither judges nor professors must be somewhat retarded." - Beldar 10/4/05
" "Yes, she goes to a pro-life church," Justice Hecht said, adding, "I know Harriet is, too." The two attended "two or three" anti-abortion fund-raising dinners in the early 1990's, he said, but added that she had not otherwise been active in the anti-abortion movement. "You can be just as pro-life as the day is long and can decide the Constitution requires Roe" to be upheld, he said. " - NYT
Charge that Bush can't pick the best is unfair
" He begins by suggesting that the President is uninterested and incapable of making sophisticated judgments about the Court and judicial philosophies. This charge is patently unfair. The President picked John Roberts, and has a stellar first term record of selecting conservative judges for the appellate bench." - BM
Bush consulted with the Senate
"
Will's second argument is that the President didn't consult with serious people before making the choice of Miers. This is also a silly argument. We know that the President consulted with eighty members of the Senate, including all of the Republicans on Senate Judiciary. " - BM
Miers has real world experience
" Miers lives in the real world. She knows what the practical impact of a Kelo decision will be and that the laws of Nigeria and the European Union aren't terribly relevant to U.S. constitutional analysis. And as important, the people that she hangs out with don't give a hoot what Linda Greenhouse and the New York Times think. That's not evidence of a quota pick — it's solid progress. " BM
Solid evangelical
" She’s an evangelical Christian who’s been a member of the Valley View Christian Church in Dallas for 25 years " - Goldberg 10/5/05
Character matters
" Do these things matter at all when it comes to her qualifications for being an Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court? Yes. They speak to her character. And in matters of justice, matters of character count. " - Kuo 10/6/05
Anti-Miers are stuck on elitism?
" I do not expect any president to know enough about judicial philosophy to pick judges on his own. I expect him or her, however, to appoint advisers who do know about such matters and follow their advice." - quoted by Beldar 10/6/05
"Never rattled"
"I've had her in court. [She's] very good, very cool, very deliberate, very poised, never gets rattled, very centered and has a very matter-of-fact way of communicating to a jury that's very effective," says 192nd District Judge Merrill L. Hartman. " - quoted in Beldar 10/6/05
" Jonathan Adler has the virtue of consistency, sticking to his previously expressed view that presidents deserve some deference to their Court appointments, and holding that there are no "sufficient, or even reasonable, grounds for seeking [Miers's] defeat in the Senate at this time." BM - Adler
Lots of non-judge appointments
"First, the notion that one needs a judge to serve on the Court runs contrary to dozens of appointments stretching back to the beginning of the nation and forward to appointments as recent as Justice William Rehnquist" - Cass 10/4/05
Constitution gives the president primacy
"The Constitution gives the president primacy on appointments of officers of the United States, including judges. It gives the Senate a far smaller role, following nomination, in safeguarding against misuse of the appointment power. It does not give the Senate an equal voice in appointments." Cass 10/4/05
"It would be useful, and productive of further reasoned debate, if some of the
people who've been proven wrong about some of these facts would squarely admit
that, take responsibility for it, and confess that their proven factual
unreliability in the past ought caution them to go slow in the future in making
sweeping pronouncements." - Beldar 10/8/05
Building one block at a time
"She's thus another representative of Bush and Karl Rove's belief in incrementalism: that the Republican majority can be made a permanent feature of the landscape if you build it one small brick at a time. " - Steyn - 10/9/05
Miers is a doer
"The world is made up of doers and kibitzers. We in the chattering classes are kibitzers. Many, like Will, have convinced themselves that thinking and writing about what other people do is more important than actually doing stuff. It isn't... Harriet Miers is a doer." - Kelly 10/9/05
A standard of "scholarship" is not disqualification
"
Only by insisting that a Supreme Court nominee possess either judicial
experience or a portfolio of scholarly writings can one pronounce Miers
unqualified. But this has never been the standard, and it's not clear
why (ideological considerations aside) Republicans should invent a new
standard with which to deal a blow to a Republican president." - Mirengoff 10/10/05
Are critics using a litmus test that they once deplored?
"
For the past four years, conservatives have argued that ideology does not constitute
a proper basis for voting against a president's qualified nominees. " - Mirengoff 10/10/05
"
Perhaps the Court is harmed by an excess of interest in the
theoretical. A solid, experienced lawyer like Miers, with no real
background in constitutional law, might look at the text, the
precedents, the briefs, and use the standard lawyer's methods to
resolve the problem at hand. What is wrong with having that style of
analysis in the mix? We need a safeguard against the excessively
theoretical." - Ann Althouse 10/11/05
Solid theory is no indication of withstanding court pressures
""... the Supremes are in the habit of arrogating to themselves decisions that should really be made by the people... And Harriet Miers may be exactly the sort of real-world type who can"
understand that." - David Warren 10/11/05
Insiders win vs. Outsiders
"
The three justices who did not disappoint the druids all came from inside the GOP Adminsitrations of the era --Thomas, Scalia, Rehnquist.
The three justices who disappointed deeply --Souter, Kennedy, and O'Connor-- came from far away.
Harriet Miers comes from the front lines of a five year war with the left, and nearly as long a war with our real enemies." Hewitt 10/12/05
"But this is elitism with a vengeance. Where, on the current Court, is there a single member who has Miers' lifelong experience as a practical lawyer, battling for her clients, winning (and losing) real cases and jousting with her fellow attorneys in professional settings? Harriet Miers would bring to the Court a badly needed breath of fresh air." - Rusher 10/13/05
Previous deference has been given to the President
"The Republicans have claimed the principle that barring maleficent revelations a president should be granted his nominee for the federal judiciary." - Tyrrell 10/13/05
Lotter position was a great example of Miers' Leadership
"By the time George W. Bush became Governor, serious problems had arisen inside then-still-young Texas Lottery. There were, at a minimum, serious appearances of impropriety and incompetence that neither he nor any other Governor of Texas could ignore. Dubya needed a trouble-shooter, a fix-it person — someone in whom he had boundless confidence as to both her effectiveness and her integrity. In the grand Texas tradition of "one riot, one ranger," he asked Harriet Miers to do that ugly, vital job." - Beldar 10/13/05
"I'm a ‘portfolio’ player on the Supremes and think it would be a good idea to have a real-life practicing lawyer on the court -- someone who's actually had to plan a transaction and explain it to a client. The justices often get themselves wound around the axle with intricate tests that don't work on the ground, failing to see that intelligibility is one of the virtues of good jurisprudence." - Wedgewood 10/17/05
CON-MIERS
Sources
Lacks jurisprudence prowess
" no evidence that she is among the leading lights of American jurisprudence" - Will 10/4/05
Lacking talents requisite for the Supreme Court
" [no evidence that Miers has] talents commensurate with the Supreme Court's tasks" - Will 10/4/05
Not a top legal mind.
" Miers' name probably would not have appeared in any of the 10,000 places on those lists " - Will 10/4/05
" We don’t know much yet about Harriet Miers, except that she is the anti-Roberts, a nominee whose credentials are less than sterling and whose qualifications for the Court are less than obvious. " - Lowry 10/4/05
" Says Miers was with an undistinguished law firm; never practiced constitutional law; never argued any big cases; never was on law review; has never written on any of the important legal issues. Says she's not even second rate, but is third rate. " - The Corner
President bowed to diversity
" Under the rubric of ``diversity'' -- nowadays, the first refuge of intellectually disreputable impulses -- the president announced, surely without fathoming the implications, his belief in identity politics and its tawdry corollary" - Will 10/4/05
"[lacking] a visible and distinguished constitutionalist track record-" Kristol - 10/3/05
Others were more qualified
" to say nothing of Michael Luttig, Michael McConnell, or Samuel Alito" - 10/3/05 Kristol
"If the White House considered Brown too controversial, then what about Edith Hollan Jones? Priscilla Owen also came to mind. If the idea was to pick a working attorney rather than a sitting jurist, Maureen Mahoney would appear to have all the qualifications that Miers lacks--she has argued over a dozen cases at the Supreme Court, clerked for William Rehnquist, had a long career in constitutional law, recognition from the National Law Journal as one of America's top 50 female litigators, and was chair of the Supreme Court Fellows Commission." - Morrissey 10/12/05
President avoiding the fight
" President Bush flinched from a fight on constitutional philosophy" Kristol 10/3/05
" By choosing a nominee suggested by Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and well known only to himself, the president has ducked a fight on the most important domestic question dividing liberals from conservatives:"Krauthammer 10/7/05
Appearance of cronyism
" her selection will unavoidably be judged as reflecting a combination of cronyism and capitulation on the part of the president." Kristol 10/3/05
" But nominating a constitutional tabula rasa to sit on what is America's constitutional court is an exercise of regal authority with the arbitrariness of a king giving his favorite general a particularly plush dukedom. The only advance we've made since then is that Supreme Court dukedoms are not hereditary." - Krauthammer 10/7/05
" a huge missed opportunity to galvanize the base heading into the midterm elections" - Hall 10/4/05
" The president would have been politically better served by what Pat Buchanan called a bench-clearing brawl" - Noonan 10/6/05
Signed a pledge supporting civil rights for homosexuals in late 80s
Puts base in difficult position
" But President Bush has put himself in the awkward position of asking his base to trust him at precisely the moment the base was expecting Bush to demonstrate their trust was well-founded in the first place." - Goldberg 10/5/05
Solid evangelical could count against her when it comes to a vote
" She’s an evangelical Christian who’s been a member of the Valley View Christian Church in Dallas for 25 years " - Goldberg 10/5/05
No evidence that she can resist the liberal influences on the court
" But there is no reason at all to believe either that she is a legal conservative or--and more importantly--that she has the spine and steel necessary to resist the pressures that constantly bend the American legal system toward the left." - Frum 10/3/05
Questions about her conservative views on stem-cell and affirmative action
" "[A]ccording to press reports, she did not win a reputation as a forceful conservative on issues such as the administration's position on stem cell research or affirmative action." " - Yoo 10/6/05
Obsession with details and process
" "'There's a stalemate there,' says one person familiar with the chief of staff's office. 'The process can't move forward because you have to get every conceivable piece of background before you can move onto the next level. People are talking about a focus on process that is so intense it gets in the way of substance.' " - Yoo 10/6/05
Failed in Card's office
Can't delegate
" "'She failed in Card's office for two reasons,' the official says. 'First, because she can't make a decision, and second, because she can't delegate, she can't let anything go. And having failed for those two reasons, they move her to be the counsel for the president, which requires exactly those two talents.'" Yoo 10/6/05
Damage to the base
" The damage dealt to the conservative movement will be huge and lasting" - Frum 10/6/05
Anti-Federalist?
" wouldn't belong to the Federalist Society" - Frum
"Shocked that so many people in the White House belonged to the FS"
" Nothing in Harriet Miers's professional background called upon her to develop considered views on the extent of congressional powers, the separation of powers, the role of judicial precedent, the importance of states in the federal system, or the need for judges to protect both the enumerated and unenumerated rights retained by the people. " - Barnett 10/4/05
" To nominate someone whose adult life reveals no record of even participation in debates about constitutional interpretation is an insult to the institution and to that vision of the institution." - Krauthammer 10/7/05
Late in the game to abortion?
"" "Yes, she goes to a pro-life church," Justice Hecht said, adding, "I know Harriet is, too." The two attended "two or three" anti-abortion fund-raising dinners in the early 1990's, he said, but added that she had not otherwise been active in the anti-abortion movement. "You can be just as pro-life as the day is long and can decide the Constitution requires Roe" to be upheld, he said. " - NYT
Unclear on Roe
" But that is not what conservatives need to know about her. What they need to know is the answer to the question about Roe. And it seems to me that, here, Harriet Miers' supporters should not try to have it both ways: satisfy conservatives on the Roe question by pointing to her moral convictions at exactly the same time they declare her moral convictions to be irrelevant to the work of a justice. " - Bradley 10/5/05
"The idea that one is supposed to sacrifice both intellectual distinction and philosophical clarity at the same time is just ridiculous."Kristol 10/7/05
The "wait and see" attitude is dangerous
"we're not going to learn anything about the candidate at the "job interview." - Right Wing News 10/6/05
Party Loyalty is fine but this is the Supreme Court
"Party loyalty is fine and conservatives certainly shouldn't erupt over every
little thing. But a Supreme Court appointment is just about as important as it
gets in politics and if this isn't the right time to fight for conservative
principles, then when will that time ever come? If this isn't an issue worth
fighting over, then what is? " - Right Wing News
Actions on the Dallas City Council are disconcertings
""There's an acknowledgement in her comments that race matters and is relevant, and from a fairness standpoint, we should acknowledge the impact of a particular political structure on voters of color," said George Washington University law professor Spencer Overton, a voting rights expert. "It's not unlike something you could see Justice Sandra Day O'Connor saying. A rigid quota system may be bad, but diversity is a compelling interest, and we want institutions to reflect society as a whole" - quoted in Prof. Baindbridge 10/8/05
Just because she is a evangelical doesn't necessitate a consevative judicual outlook
"The problem for Bush a week after announcing his choice of Miers stems from the
fact that it is entirely possible for someone to hold moral (or religious, for
that matter) views that are deemed conservative, yet to approach judging in ways
that are at odds with the judicial conservatism that the president himself says
he wants in a jurist" - Eastland 10/9/05
Supreme Court is the "big leagues"
"Miers is no mediocre. But she is no legal giant, either. Her public statements have been uniformly platitudinous. Some avid Bush supporters who have met with her have come away underwhelmed by her acuity and Milquetoast personality, as well as unsure of her convictions. " - Taylor 10/9/05
Last straw
Conservatives fed up with overspending, education, immigration issues, Katrina are finally upset enough to take a stand.
Obscurity and silence on political matters gives us reason to pause
"But that was before I interviewed more than a dozen of her friends and colleagues along with political players in Texas. I came away convinced that questions about Ms. Miers should be raised now--and loudly--because she has spent her entire life avoiding giving a clear picture of herself. "She is unrevealing to the point that it's an obsession," says one of her close colleagues at her law firm. " - Fund 10/10/05
Senator Specter has reservations about her constitutional experience
Miers sympathetic to feminist liberalist?
"By all accounts, despite her personal opposition to abortion, Miers is sympathetic to at least some of what her feminist allies believe. Does this include sympathy with affirmative action? Probably. After all, Miers got elected by feminists, who supported her chiefly because she was a woman. " - Kurtz 10/10/05
Another O'Conner
"
Indeed, in many ways, Ms. Miers resembles the early Sandra Day
O'Connor, another elected official who backed some liberal positions
during her time in the Arizona Legislature. As Justice O'Connor began
drifting to the center she became the crucial swing vote on a host of
cases. Legal scholars began referring to the "O'Connor Court." Now, with Ms. Miers slated to take the O'Connor seat it may become the "Miers Court." - Fund 10/10/05
Miers promoted diversity and other perceived PC terms
"
A few key themes recur in these short essays: Miers' aversion to
conflict, or even outspoken debate; her devotion to the ideal of
"diversity"; and her commitment to the interests of the legal profession above all else. " Frum 10/9/05
No great lawyers have chimed in for Miers
" Think about all of the famous lawyers that you
know, all the great conservative jurists, all the people who have
been through all the battles. And ask youself, have you heard
from them over the past eight days? Is there one of them who has
spoken up in defense of this nomination? And you'll see, they've
all gone quiet." Frum 10/10/05 on HH radio
Contradictions
"The White House and its allies have long argued that it is wrong to bring a
judicial nominee's faith into the discussion about his merits, and any attempt
to do so amounts to religious bigotry. When it was suggested that John Roberts's
Catholic faith might be an area for inquiry in his confirmation, White House
allies recoiled in horror." - Lowry 10/11/05
"The White House was happy to trumpet the fact that Roberts graduated summa cum
laude from Harvard undergrad and law school. Now it insinuates that anyone
looking for similar credentials in its latest Supreme Court pick is guilty of "elitism." Indeed, White House point-man Dan Coats suggests her role will be to keep the Court from becoming too intellectual (what with that egghead Roberts now leading it). " - Lowry 10/11/05
"And on it goes. Miers is a trailblazer, but she will loyally follow Roberts's
lead. She is an independent woman, but will vote however Bush wants her to vote.
She has an excellent judicial temperament, but conservatives better not
criticize her too harshly or she will turn against them." Lowry 10/11/05
White House has not promoted her qualifications well
"
Given that conservatives generally don't trust trial lawyers and the
Bar Association and are at best ambivalent to government sponsorship of
gambling, those sound rather weak as arguments for a nomination to the
Supreme Court. If Miers has other accomplishments that indicate why
conservatives should trust Bush in her nomination, we've yet to hear
that from the White House." - Capts Quarters 10/12/05
Charge of sexism is just flay wrong
"There's no sexism here. Plenty of people would have been happy, ecstatic with Janice Rogers Brown or Priscilla Owen or Edith Jones, a number of qualified women" - Rush 10/11/05
Refuting "intellectual credentials" is a bad approach
"
The pro-Miers response to this has been to assert that intellectual
credentials don't matter or even that the lack of same is an advantage.
This does appeal to a certain antielitist, or even anti-intellectual,
strain in American politics. But there's nothing sexist about
disagreeing. If Laura Bush has some evidence that Miers does possess
intellectual heft, she would do better to come forward with it rather
than insult the critics." - Taranto 10/11/05
Never made known any Constitutional issue
Laura Ingraham - Hannity and Colmes 10/11/05
White House has not made the case well
"If the administration had a compelling rationale for Harriet Miers's nomination, they would have made it. Simply going at their critics was not only destructive, it signaled an emptiness in their arsenal. If they had a case they'd have made it. "You're a sexist snob" isn't a case; it's an insult, one that manages in this case to be both startling and boring." - Noonan 10/13/05
White House vetting was lacking... caught off guard
"Not only did the vetting fail to anticipate skepticism about her lack of experience in constitutional law or the firestorm of criticism from conservatives, but it left the White House scrambling to provide reporters with even the most basic information about the closed-mouthed nominee. Almost every news story seemed to catch the White House off guard and unprepared." - Fund 10/13/05
Slight Hypocrisy on being on the Texas Lottery Commission
"
For years -- crucial years in the war on terror -- she will have to
recuse herself from judging the constitutionality of these decisions
because she will have been a party to having made them in the first
place. The Supreme Court will be left with an absent chair on precisely
the laws-of-war issues on which she is supposed to bring so much." - Krauthammer 10/7/05
Miers nomination degrades the court to political outcomes rather than rule of law
"
President Bush has now gone further in internalizing the lessons of the
Bork debacle. Harriet Miers is a "superstealth" nominee--a close friend of the president with no available paper trail who keeps her cards so close to her chest they might as well be plastered on it. If Ms. Miers is confirmed, it will reinforce the popular belief that the Supreme Court is more about political outcomes than the rule of law. " - Fund 10/17/05
Miers seems to foster a "get along" mentality with liberals
"
Miers’ entire career has been spent going along to get along with her liberal-lawyer friends. She seems so oblivious to this that she wanted the liberal ABA to vet President Bush’s judicial nominees. Isn’t this someone who would be easily swayed by the liberal climate of the Court? " PoliPundit 10/11/05
Arguments against Miers are "Ivy-school" complaints
Brut Hume 10/4/05
Critics want the fights for the fight's sake
"Victory for them is seeing the enemy bloodied and humiliated. They mistake the momentary thrill of triumph in combate, however evanescent, for lasting victory where it counts: a Supreme Court comprised of Justices who will assemble majorities for decisions reflecting the original intent of the Founders. " Lifson 10/4/05
Can help with the coffee
" As the court’s new junior member, the 60 year old lady Harriet Miers will finally give a break to Stephen Breyer, who has been relegated to closing and opening the door of the conference room, and fetching beverages for his more senior Justices. " - Lifson 10/4/05
"President Bush knew how important this nomination was to the grass roots. And if
I could predict beforehand that choosing Miers would be a "calamitous error" politically, then certainly the Bush Administration must have known it as well" - Right Wing News 10/6/05
Rovian Strategy
"
What if the Miers pick is at least partly calculated to coax out
another nomination? What if Bush and Rove are playing to an audience of
two, playing down fears they would nominate a raving ideologue if one
of the two oldest justices decided to...(whisper it) retire? Had they
gone for the A-lister this time and brought on Armageddon, they might
have cemented the resolve of Stephens and Ginsburg to stay to the
death. This way, who knows?" - quoted on TKS
Workhorse not show horse
"Harriet Miers is the very model of the work-horse, not the show-horse, and
unless you happen to be, say, another lawyer who handles complicated litigation
in Texas — me — you're understandably likely to have been uninformed about most of those facts." - Beldar 10/8/05
Opponents are sexist
"
First lady Laura Bush joined her husband in defending his nominee to
the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday and said it was possible some critics
were being sexist in their opposition to Harriet Miers." - Laura Bush 10/11/05
Opposition is bored
"Washington's yearning for excitement is what actuates this hullabaloo. It also actuates the press's incessant coverage of it. This town is easily bored and boredom often sets in motion some of history's most frivolous events. Think back. Was it not general boredom that accounted for the election of Bill Clinton over the perfectly normal President George H. W. Bush?" - Tyrrell 10/13/05
CON-MIERS
Sources
President lacks prowess to judge these things.
" He has neither the inclination nor the ability to make sophisticated judgments about competing approaches to construing the Constitution" - Will 10/4/05
President isn't fit to chose
" the president has forfeited his right to be trusted as a custodian of the Constitution" - Will 10/4/05
Charge of cronyism
" prevent them from reducing the Supreme Court to a private plaything useful for fulfilling whims on behalf of friends." - Will 10/4/05
" Being a Bush loyalist and friend is not a qualification for the Supreme Court." - NRO Editors 10/3/05
Miers supporters playing the victim card
" playing the victim card clarified, as much as anything has so far done, her credentials" - Will 10/4/05
Select on the Dick Cheney Model
Tim Russert 10/3/05
Negative affect on 2006 elections
" The president has now officially stepped on a strategic landmine heading in the 2006 midterm congressional elections." - Hall 10/4/05
Snubs the base
" a major snubbing of the social conservative base " - Hall 10/4/05
Solid evangelical
Bush blinked
" unforced error" - Frum 10/3/05
"The president misread the field, the players, their mood and attitude. He called the play, they looked up from the huddle and balked. And debated. And dissed. Momentum was lost. The quarterback looked foolish." - Noonan 10/6/05
Even if she votes right she's not truly a Supreme
"The objection to Miers is not that she is not experienced enough or not expensively enough educated for the job. It is that she is not good enough for the job.
(See more on this in my article in the next print NR.)
And she will remain not good enough even if she votes the right way on the court, or anyway starts out voting the right way. A Supreme Court justice is more than just a vote. A justice is also a voice." - Frum 10/6/05
Anonymous people against
" Aside from all the substantial reasons I have cited to date, I am speaking out because there are so many others who want to speak but cannot. " - Frum 10/6/05
Lacks intellectual credentials
" Can you see any indication of intellectual excellence?" - Frum 10/6/05
Supreme Court is Big leagues
" The Supreme Court is the big league of the legal profession, and Ms. Miers has never even played the judicial equivalent of high school ball, much less won a Heisman Trophy. " - Barnett 10/4/05
"She once told me that the president was the most brilliant man she had ever met. So reports conservative writer and former Bush speechwriter David Frum, in National Review Online. Unless White House Counsel Harriet Miers explains that she was joking or Frum was hallucinating, this alone may cast enough doubt on her judgment to warrant a "no" vote on her Supreme Court nomination." - Taylor 10/9/05
Supreme Court nomination was to get rid of her
"
raising the question of whether the ultimate motivation for this
nomination is to open the way to hiring a new Counsel by kicking a
failed Counsel upstairs" - Frum 10/10/05
"... I have spoken to people who have spoken to him, and they all say he's not putting a lot of fingerprints on this. He's making it clear this was Andy Card's idea, not his."Interview with Frum on HH "
"
There is a doom-and-gloom element on the Right which is just waiting to be betrayed, convinced that their hardy band of true believers will lose by treachery those victories to which justice entitles them. They are stuck in the decades-long tragic phase of conservative politics, when country club Republicans inevitably sold out the faith in order to gain acceptability in the Beltway media and social circuit. " - Lifson 10/4/05
"
Senators beginning what ought to be a protracted and exacting scrutiny
of Harriet Miers should be guided by three rules. First, it is not
important that she be confirmed. Second, it might be very important
that she not be. Third, the presumption -- perhaps rebuttable but
certainly in need of rebutting -- should be that her nomination is not
a defensible exercise of presidential discretion to which senatorial
deference is due." - Will 10/5/05
" Rush to prejudgment. This is pretty much the order of the day regarding
Harriet Miers. Crony. Intellectual lightweight. Souter redux -- all of
these political epithets have been tossed hurriedly and ungraciously
toward President Bush's nominee for the Supreme Court. " Kmmiec 10/4/05
"
According to the transcript on www.radioblogger.com, when Hewitt asked whether he trusts the president's judgment of someone's legal philosophy, Ramesh answered candidly, tough-mindedly, and I think correctly: "no, I don't think that a president can or should be in the position of making evaluations of somebody's judicial philosophy. It's not the type of thing . . . that you'd expect a president to be good at." - BM
"
There are 1,084,504 lawyers in the U.S. What distinguishes Harriet
Miers from any of them other than her connection with the president? To
have selected her, when conservative jurisprudence has J. Harvie
Wilkinson, Michael Luttig, Michael McConnell and at least a dozen
others on a bench deeper than that of the New York Yankees, is
scandalous." - Krauthammer 10/7/05
"
Judging takes work, but the folks who think "constitutional reasoning" is a talent requiring divination, intense effort and years of monastic study are the same folks who will inevitably give you "Lemon tests," balancing formulas, "penumbras" and concurrences that make your head spin "
"
However nice, helpful, prompt and tidy she is, Harriet Miers isn't qualified to play a Supreme Court justice on "The West Wing," let alone to be a real one. Both Republicans and Democrats should be alarmed that Bush seems to believe his power to appoint judges is absolute. This is what "advice and consent" means. " - Ann Coulter 10/6/05
"
I continue to respect Prof. Barnett. But I reject — I mock and I ridicule without apology — his notion that only "experts" or "advisers who do know about such matters" have the ability or the authority to decide who ought to be appointed to the courts. I submit that that notion is profoundly anti-democratic, profoundly insulting to the American public and the office of the POTUS (whoever holds it), and profoundly contrary to both the history and intent of our constitutional structure under the rule of law. As I commented on Prof. Barnett's post, if he really believes that, he's "not just off into the elitist deep end now, [he's] drowned in it." - Beldar
"
Locke Liddell & Sapp is the product of a merger between two old and very well-regarded firms — Locke Purnell in Dallas and Liddell Sapp in Houston. It was a merger of equals, and one that Harriet Miers presided over as managing partner of Locke Purnell and co-managing partner of the merged firms. Calling the resulting firm, or either of its predecessors, "undistinguished" is absolutely outrageous and contrary to fact. It's the kind of thing that only an absolute snob — someone who takes the position that no Texas firm could ever be anything but undistinguished — would say. And like the lawyers from Locke Purnell and Liddell Sapp, I've been regularly kicking such snobs' butts in court for the last 25 years — and not just in Texas courts, either. " - Beldar 10/6/05
"
Miers will surely shine in her Judiciary Committee hearings, but that
is because expectations have been set so low. If she can give a fairly
good facsimile of John Roberts's testimony, she'll be considered a
surprisingly good witness. But what does she bring to the bench?" - Krauthammer 10/7/05
"Similarly, I am dismayed by the reckless rumormongering and innuendo that are surrounding this nomination. That, alas, is to some degree a natural result of a nomination of someone who lacks a significant public record. But it doesn’t serve the process of forming an accurate judgment on the nomination, nor is it fair to Miers." - Whelan 10/7/04
A NOTE TO BOTH SIDES [Ramesh Ponnuru]
First, to HM supporters: Take a deep breath. Are you sure you haven't dug in irrationally? Have you reached the point where you're treating people who know Miers and say she's impressive as reasons to support her, and people who know her and say she's not as axe-grinders? Are you denigrating "scribblers" and "opiners" when writing opinions is what the job in question mostly involves?
Second, to the opponents: Take a deep breath. Are you sure you haven't dug in irrationally? Many of you have been saying that it's not enough for a justice to have the right positions. (Others are unsure that Miers has the right positions on legal issues, but that's a different issue.) Are you sure you're not undervaluing the ability to reach the right conclusions? A solid opinion that reaches the right legal conclusion is superior to a weak one that also does. But either one is superior to an opinion, however well done in certain respects, that gets the law wrong. And it's not as though we've got a surplus of good votes on the Supreme Court. Some of the opponents seem to be talking as though we do. - Ramesh 10/6/05
"
With the president's knowledge of Ms. Miers, his stated commitment to
rebalancing the judiciary and his conservative record - not only in
appointing judges but on big decisions in general - conservatives
should feel comfortable in taking the president at his word that he has
just now delivered another nominee in that tradition." - Newt 10/7/05
"At some point, however, conservatives need to stop measuring Miers against their ideal of a Justice and decide the basic question of yea or nay -- should she be confirmed or not. How conservatives come out may matter. The hearings could easily result in united opposition by Democrats. Miers almost certainly will not give the sort of assurances on Roe v. Wade that Democrats will demand. And, unlike with Roberts, the Dems will not be constrained by a record of excellence or charismatic appearance to vote for Miers. The public's initial reaction to Miers was far cooler than its initial reaction to the Chief Justice. The only constraint on Democrats will be the sense that Bush might nominate someone worse from their perspective if Miers is defeated. But the opportunity to deal Bush a huge defeat, coupled with pressure from the abortion activists, may prove too hard to resist. Thus, if the Republicans don't present something like a united front, this nomination could be stopped." - Paul @ PowerLine Blog
"God save us from brilliant, eloquent, articulate Justices, steeped in intellectualism and rigorous analysis of life and law, who continue to screw things up on a near daily basis. Save us from deep thinkers who are too distracted to keep themselves from stepping in the dog poo and then tracking it all over the house. God grant us some smart but practical Justices — "modest" Justices, in Chief Justice Roberts' terminology. Justices who solve the problems that are brought to them in their limited roles as judges, rather than creating them. Justices who don't think it's their duty or their right to go looking for other perceived problems outside the proper limited scope of their role, or think it's their duty or right to solve everything everywhere." - Beldar 10/8/05
"This administration needs to be held responsible for its own shortcomings but not those of previous Republican administrations." - Thomas Sowell
"True, that's little more than a hunch on my part. In the meantime, what's left is the base's distress and the perception of weakness on the president's part. The first is real and may cause problems in 2006, though I can't see it costing the GOP its congressional majorities. As for Bush personally, he was the better of the alternatives in both 2000 and 2004, but come on, the "compassionate conservative" thing was, in its implications, far more insulting to the base than the steel tariffs or the proposed illegal immigrant amnesty or the judicial nominees. Bush, it seems ever more obvious, is the Third Wayer Clinton only pretended to be. " Steyn 10/9/05
"
The nomination of Miers is one of three things: a brilliant move by the
president; a blunder like Reagan's nominations of Justice O'Connor and
Kennedy or the first Bush's of Souter; or a betrayal of the sort that
occasions taking leave of the whole project." - Hewitt 10/10/05
"
The Miers nomination was like getting up on Christmas morning, bursting
downstairs, and opening up your big, beautifully wrapped present only
to find socks and underwear. All that waiting, all the anticipation,
all that “being good”, all seemingly wasted on a gift that isn’t worth either the giving or the receiving." Frum 10/11/05
"
I must tell you, however, that I am rather calmed down now. A little
optimistic. Maybe Miers’ll be all right. Maybe our initial reactions are overblown. And maybe some of the most thunderous conservative commentary has been a little insulting — to Bush and to Miers. Wrongly insulting. " - Jay Nordlinger 10/11/05
"
The conservative opposition to Miers is rooted in the conceit among
some Beltway operators --echoed by some conservative pundits-- that
some conservatives know how to discern a nominee's philosophy and future trajectory, and are better positioned than the president, the vice president, senior aides, former White House Counsel lawyers, law professors Gralia and Starr, Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht, James Dobson, Jay Sekulow, Chuck Colson etc. " - Hewitt 10/12/05
"The full Tim McCarthy. He was the Secret Service agent who stood like Stonewall and took the bullet for Ronald Reagan outside the Washington Hilton. Harriet Miers can withdraw her name, take the hit, and let the president's protectors throw him in the car. Her toughness and professionalism would appear wholly admirable. She'd not just survive; she'd flourish, going from much-spoofed office wife to world-famous lawyer and world-class friend. Added side benefit: Her nobility makes her attackers look bad. She's better than they, more loyal and serious. An excellent moment of sacrifice and revenge." - Noonan 10/13/05
I don't condemn NR/NRO for putting up this petition, but I genuinely lament what it says about the nature of their further participation in the debate.... The words "hack," "dullard," "corrupt," "crony," and "squish" don't appear, but they do shout rather loudly from the subtext, at least as I interpret it" - Beldar 10/13/05
"
I spoke to Karl Rove an hour ago. His support for the Miers nomination
is not merely enthusiastic, but adamant and even vehement. The judicial
philosophy question? She has been a member of the White House's
judicial selection committee for three years, not the one I had
thought, as the Deputy Chief of Staff sits on the committee, along with
the White House Counsel and a handful of other senior aides, including
Karl Rove. Every judicial nomination the president has made for the
past three years has come through this committee. Prior to the
discussion in the committee, every nominee's work is assembled and
analyzed, and interviews are conducted by the committee members." - Hewitt 10/13/05
"The rush to judgment on Miers from the President’s allies has been striking. Not only has it been immediate and widespread, it also has been – in many cases – extraordinarily immoderate. No subtle weighing of Miers’ positive and negative attributes for the job; no indulging the possibility that someone who doesn’t fit the model so many of us have in mind for Supreme Court appointments could possibly make a good justice. And no willingness to suspend judgment, to see if the President indeed has done what he promised and given us a justice who is thoughtful, committed to a law-bound and modest view of judging, and committed to the vision of constitutional law the President consistently has endorsed." - Ronald Cass 10/14/05
"On Oct. 3, the day the Miers nomination was announced, Mr. Dobson and other religious conservatives held a conference call to discuss the nomination. One of the people on the call took extensive notes, which I have obtained. According to the notes, two of Ms. Miers's close friends--both sitting judges--said during the call that she would vote to overturn Roe." - Fund 10/17/05
"
Those defenders say that we should nevertheless trust Mr. Bush's
judgment. At the very moment that conservatives have begun to conclude
that their bets on Mr. Bush are no longer paying off, Mr. Bush has
asked them to double down. That request has even pro-Miers
conservatives feeling disillusioned, and other conservatives feeling
betrayed. That's what's dividing conservatives - and it's why they're
thinking more and more about life after President Bush." - Ponnuru 10/17/05
"
The Miers nomination shows the
strength of the conservative movement. This is no "crackup." It's a crackdown. We conservatives are unified in our objectives. And we are organized to advance them. The purpose of the Miers debate is to ensure that we are doing the very best we can to move the nation in the right direction. And when all is said and done, we will be even stronger and more focused on our agenda and defeating those who obstruct it, just in time for 2006 and 2008. Lest anyone forget, for several years before the 1980 election, we had knockdown battles within the GOP. The result: Ronald Reagan won two massive landslides. " - Limbaugh 10/16/05